AFL Match Review Panel – 2012 Finals week 1 – Nick Off Maxwell

Match Review Panel Findings

AFL Match Review Panel – 2012 Finals week 1 – Nick Off Maxwell

(Skip to Update section)

Finals footy is hard footy and when the footy is hard, sometimes players cross the line from fair to foul. When it does, some times Mark Fraser and his band of merry men of the Match Review Panel have to step in and rule on incidents. There have been many come up in Week 1 of the AFL 2012 Finals and some guys will miss finals and some will have late starts to the year.

Jarrod Roughead

Roughy has at least one week off with the Hawks moving directly to the preliminary final but will his bump on Chris Dawes off the ball see him miss games? Here it is if you haven’t seen it:

Tom Harley’s point about Steve Johnson is a good one. If this is seen exactly the same as it, Roughy will actually not only be fine as he has no points overhead and no loading, in fact he has a 5 year good record that means that if he gets the 125 points, he could challenge the decision and see what the tribunal members think of this sort of incident with out missing a week.

Predicted outcome: Reprimand (most likely challenged)

Nick Maxwell

Pies play the rampaging Eagles this week but they will do it without their skipper. The question will be how many weeks he misses. Lets go to the video:

Nick is in trouble and in fact is already on Report. His coach, of course, tried to defend him saying this happens all the time and their was nothing in it. I really hope that Bucks was just trying everything as that’s rubbish. This doesn’t happen all the time. Poppy left the field with a blood nose on the day and had to play out the game with strapping on his nose. Reports are that he has a broken nose, which will hurt his cause. So he will most likely get: High Contact, Medimum Impact and Reckless behavior. Thats 6 activation points, meaning a Level 3 offense. Nick will be hoping that this is considered a strike as that would mean 225 points. If it is rough contact, it will be 325 points. He has no good or bad record (2009 incident means no weeks in last 3 years but not a 5 year good record) which means he will either miss 1 or 2 weeks. If it is a rough conduct charge, it will not only mean 2 weeks but it will mean that challenging those 2 weeks will be done while risking the grand final!

Prediction: 3 weeks down to 2 with an early plea

James Kelly

James in on holiday but will that extend into the season? He is on report for a bump on Docker Tendai Mzungu:

James is in some trouble. This is the sort of trouble. This is the reason for the bumping rule. The good news is that it didn’t hurt the Docker too much at all but the bad news is that the MRP will most likely grade this on the potiental to do injury (which is in the tribunal rules). This will most likely be a High contact, Reckless and Medium impact (on potential to do damage)  and so a similar situation to the Maxwell one. I have to admit to not having checked out his past record.

Prediction: 3 weeks down to 2.

Quinten Lynch

The Q-Stick may miss this week after charging into Scott McMahon. I don’t have YouTube vision of this one but it is available on Smart Replay. This is a bit of a tougher one. I think he will go for this. McMahon was hurt and Lynch didn’t seem to make much attempt to get the ball and lead with the knee. Body conduct, low impact, reckless would be 4 activation points or level 1. He has 20% loading and some points hanging over so if this is the case, he will get 1 week.

Prediction: 1 week

Brent Harvey

Brent lost it and whacked Daniel Kerr and will go for this:

This is bad. It knocked Kerr around for a while. Striking, High Conduct, Intentional, low impact, level 3, 225 points. He has a 90 odd point hanging over his head from earlier this year.

Prediction: 3 weeks down to 2 with the early plea.

Any other major ones I missed? Comment below.

UPDATES

  • Mon 11:30pm: Two players reported on Match day this week. Nick Maxwell and James Kelly. Details here.
  • Mon 1:25pm: Just doing further research on the thought that Jarryd Roughead could be classed as intentional due to it being behind play. Looking at the rules of the game, it specifically says that counts for “Striking” charges. The wording is:

    Classification of certain strikes

    For the purpose of these guidelines all players should note that the
    following factors are considered when determining the classification
    of a striking offence:

    Intent: Notwithstanding any other part of these guidelines, the fact
    that an act of striking occurred behind the play or off the ball or during
    a break in play or with a raised forearm or elbow is usually conclusive
    that the strike was intentional.

    If the MRP classify Roughead’s action as a Strike to make it intentional, I would think it would be Intentional, low impact and body contact. That would be Level 2. Level 2 striking is 125 points meaning that he would still be available for the game. As a Hawk fan, starting to get a little nervous on this one as medium impact or intentional rough conduct would see Roughy possibly missing a week. He would be able to challenge (if it is 225 Points) and not risk an extra week.

  • Mon 5pm: In somewhat less relevant news now, Nick Maxwell gets 2,Lynch 1, Kelly 1,Tarrant&Roughy Repremands,Harvey 4 (3 Kerr + 1 A Selwood)
  • Mon 5:30pm: Full details of the Charges now available.
  • Tues 10:20am: Word is that the Eagles will challenge the Lynch charge. Not surprising as it will still be under 2 weeks. Not much to lose!
  • Tues 11:30am: As reported earlier. Lynch to challenge, as will Brent Harvey challenge both offenses. All others this week accepted their penlties. We also have Montagna’s charge from last week.
  • Tues 11:45am: Full details of the tribunal hearings and accepted charges is available
  • Tues 12:15pm: If you don’t understand the MRP findings, you have no excuse but to watch the Verdict video with MRP Head, Mark Fraser. If don’t agree, that is a different story. Video now available.
  • Tues evening: Montagna upheld and both Brent Harvey’s incidents were upheld, he has got 6 weeks. Lynch successfully got his charge thrown out.

————————-

The Verdict Video with Match Review Panel head, Mark Fraser:

AFL Tribunal, Tuesday September 11:

Leigh Montagna, St Kilda, has been charged with a Level One engaging in rough conduct offence (125 points, one match) against Andrew Walker, Carlton, during the third quarter of the Round 23 match between St Kilda and Carlton, played at Etihad Stadium on Sunday September 2, 2012.

Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Carlton Football Club, the incident was assessed as reckless conduct (two points), low impact (one point) and body contact (one point). This is a total of four activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level One offence, drawing 125 demerit points and a one-match sanction. He has an existing poor record of one match suspended within the last three years, increasing the penalty by 10 per cent to 137.50 points and a one-match sanction.

Quinten Lynch, West Coast, has been charged with a Level One charging offence (125 demerit points, one match) against Scott McMahon, North Melbourne, during the first quarter of the First Elimination Final between West Coast and North Melbourne, played at Patersons Stadium on Sunday September 9, 2012.

Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the North Melbourne Football Club, the incident was assessed as negligent conduct (one point), low impact (one point) and body contact (one point). This is a total of three activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level One offence, drawing 125 demerit points and a one-match sanction. He has an existing bad record of two matches suspended within the last three years, increasing the penalty by 20 per cent to 150 demerit points. He also has 37.50 demerit points carried over from within the last 12 months, increasing the penalty to 187.50 points and a one-match sanction.

Brent Harvey, North Melbourne, has been charged with a Level Four striking offence (325 demerit points, three matches) against Daniel Kerr, West Coast, during the third quarter of the First Elimination Final between North Melbourne and West Coast, played at Patersons Stadium on Sunday September 9, 2012.

Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the West Coast Football Club, the incident was assessed as intentional conduct (three points), medium impact (two points) and high contact (two points). This is a total of seven activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level Four offence, drawing 325 demerit points and a three-match sanction. He has 93.75 demerit points carried over from within the last 12 months, increasing the penalty to 418.75 points and a four-match sanction.

Brent Harvey, North Melbourne, has been charged with a Level Three striking offence (225 demerit points, two matches) against Adam Selwood, West Coast, during the fourth quarter of the First Elimination Final between North Melbourne and West Coast, played at Patersons Stadium on Sunday September 9, 2012.

Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the West Coast Football Club, the incident was assessed as reckless conduct (two points), medium impact (two points) and high contact (two points). This is a total of six activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level Three offence, drawing 225 demerit points and a two-match sanction. He has no existing good or bad record for this offence.

 

Sanctions Accepted:

Chris Tarrant, Collingwood, has accepted a reprimand and 70.31 points towards his future record for striking Lance Franklin, Hawthorn, during the first quarter of the First Qualifying Final between Collingwood and Hawthorn, played at the MCG on Friday September 7, 2012.

Jarryd Roughead, Hawthorn, has accepted a reprimand and 70.31 points towards his future record for engaging in rough conduct against Chris Dawes, Collingwood, during the first quarter of the First Qualifying Final between Hawthorn and Collingwood, played at the MCG on Friday September 7, 2012.

Heath Shaw, Collingwood, has accepted a $900 sanction for wrestling Brad Sewell, Hawthorn during the second quarter of the First Qualifying Final between Collingwood and Hawthorn, played at the MCG on Friday September 7, 2012.

 

Brad Sewell, Hawthorn, has accepted a $900 sanction for wrestling Heath Shaw, Collingwood during the second quarter of the First Qualifying Final between Collingwood and Hawthorn, played at the MCG on Friday September 7, 2012.

 

Nick Maxwell, Collingwood, has accepted a two-match sanction for engaging in rough conduct against Paul Puopolo, Hawthorn, during the third quarter of the First Qualifying Final between Collingwood and Hawthorn, played at the MCG on Friday September 7, 2012.

Patrick Dangerfield, Adelaide Crows, has accepted a $900 sanction for making negligent contact with umpire Justin Schmitt during the first quarter of the Second Qualifying Final between the Adelaide Crows and the Sydney Swans, played at AAMI Stadium on Saturday September 8, 2012.

 

James Kelly, Geelong Cats, has accepted a one-match sanction for bumping or making forceful contact from front-on against Tendai Mzungu, Fremantle, during the third quarter of the Second Elimination Final between the Geelong Cats and Fremantle, played at the MCG on Saturday September 8, 2012.

Charges Laid:

Chris Tarrant, Collingwood, has been charged with a Level Two striking offence (125 demerit points, one match) against Lance Franklin, Hawthorn, during the first quarter of the First Qualifying Final between Collingwood and Hawthorn, played at the MCG on Friday September 7, 2012.

 

In summary, due to his previous good record, he can accept a reprimand and 70.31 points towards his future record with an early plea.

 

Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Hawthorn Football Club, the incident was assessed as intentional conduct (three points), low impact (one point) and body contact (one point). This is a total of five activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level Two offence, drawing 125 demerit points and a one-match sanction. He has an existing five-year good record, which reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to a reprimand and 93.75 points towards his future record. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to a reprimand and 70.31 points towards his future record.

 

 

Jarryd Roughead, Hawthorn, has been charged with a Level One engaging in rough conduct offence (125 demerit points, one match) against Chris Dawes, Collingwood, during the first quarter of the First Qualifying Final between Hawthorn and Collingwood, played at the MCG on Friday September 7, 2012.

 

In summary, due to his previous good record, he can accept a reprimand and 70.31 points towards his future record with an early plea.

 

Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Collingwood Football Club, the incident was assessed as reckless conduct (two points), low impact (one point) and body contact (one point). This is a total of four activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level One offence, drawing 125 demerit points and a one-match sanction. He has an existing five-year good record, which reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to a reprimand and 93.75 points towards his future record. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to a reprimand and 70.31 points towards his future record.

 

 

Heath Shaw, Collingwood, has been charged with a first offence for wrestling Brad Sewell, Hawthorn ($1200 sanction) during the second quarter of the First Qualifying Final between Collingwood and Hawthorn, played at the MCG on Friday September 7, 2012.

 

In summary, he can accept a $900 sanction with an early plea.

 

A first offence for wrestling is a $1200 sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to a $900 sanction.

 

 

Brad Sewell, Hawthorn, has been charged with a first offence for wrestling Heath Shaw, Collingwood ($1200 sanction) during the second quarter of the First Qualifying Final between Collingwood and Hawthorn, played at the MCG on Friday September 7, 2012.

 

In summary, he can accept a $900 sanction with an early plea.

 

A first offence for wrestling is a $1200 sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to a $900 sanction.

 

 

Nick Maxwell, Collingwood, has been charged with a Level Three engaging in rough conduct offence (325 demerit points, three matches) against Paul Puopolo, Hawthorn, during the third quarter of the First Qualifying Final between Collingwood and Hawthorn, played at the MCG on Friday September 7, 2012.

 

In summary, he can accept a two-match sanction with an early plea.

 

Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Hawthorn Football Club, the incident was assessed as reckless conduct (two points), medium impact (two points) and high contact (two points). This is a total of six activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level Three offence, drawing 325 demerit points and a three-match sanction. He has no existing good or bad record. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to 243.75 points and a two-match sanction.

 

 

Patrick Dangerfield, Adelaide Crows, has been charged with a first offence for making negligent contact with umpire Justin Schmitt ($1200 sanction) during the first quarter of the Second Qualifying Final between the Adelaide Crows and the Sydney Swans, played at AAMI Stadium on Saturday September 8, 2012.

 

In summary, he can accept a $900 sanction with an early plea.

 

A first offence for making negligent contact with an umpire is a $1200 sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to a $900 sanction.

 

 

James Kelly, Geelong Cats, has been charged with a Level One bumping or making forceful contact from front-on offence (125 demerit points, one match) against Tendai Mzungu, Fremantle, during the third quarter of the Second Elimination Final between the Geelong Cats and Fremantle, played at the MCG on Saturday September 8, 2012.

 

In summary, due to his previous poor record, his one-match sanction must remain at one match, even with an early plea.

 

Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Fremantle Football Club, the incident was assessed as negligent conduct (one point), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points). This is a total of four activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level One offence, drawing 125 demerit points and a one-match sanction. He has 93.75 demerit points carried over from within the last 12 months, increasing the penalty to 218.75 points and a two-match sanction. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to 164.06 points and a one-match sanction.

 

 

Quinten Lynch, West Coast, has been charged with a Level One charging offence (125 demerit points, one match) against Scott McMahon, North Melbourne, during the first quarter of the First Elimination Final between West Coast and North Melbourne, played at Patersons Stadium on Sunday September 9, 2012.

 

In summary, due to his previous poor record, his one-match sanction must remain at one match, even with an early plea.

 

Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the North Melbourne Football Club, the incident was assessed as negligent conduct (one point), low impact (one point) and body contact (one point). This is a total of three activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level One offence, drawing 125 demerit points and a one-match sanction. He has an existing bad record of two matches suspended within the last three years, increasing the penalty by 20 per cent to 150 demerit points. He also has 37.50 demerit points carried over from within the last 12 months, increasing the penalty to 187.50 points and a one-match sanction. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to 140.63 points and a one-match sanction.

 

 

Brent Harvey, North Melbourne, has been charged with a Level Four striking offence (325 demerit points, three matches) against Daniel Kerr, West Coast, during the third quarter of the First Elimination Final between North Melbourne and West Coast, played at Patersons Stadium on Sunday September 9, 2012.

 

In summary, due to his previous poor record, his three-match sanction must remain at three matches, even with an early plea.

 

Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the West Coast Football Club, the incident was assessed as intentional conduct (three points), medium impact (two points) and high contact (two points). This is a total of seven activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level Four offence, drawing 325 demerit points and a three-match sanction. He has 93.75 demerit points carried over from within the last 12 months, increasing the penalty to 418.75 points and a four-match sanction. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to 314.06 points and a three-match sanction.

 

 

Brent Harvey, North Melbourne, has been charged with a Level Three striking offence (225 demerit points, two matches) against Adam Selwood, West Coast, during the fourth quarter of the First Elimination Final between North Melbourne and West Coast, played at Patersons Stadium on Sunday September 9, 2012.

In summary, his two-match sanction can be reduced to one match with an early plea. Media should note that Brent Harvey’s carry-over points can only be applied to one offence, and are not applied to both penalties.

Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the West Coast Football Club, the incident was assessed as reckless conduct (two points), medium impact (two points) and high contact (two points). This is a total of six activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level Three offence, drawing 225 demerit points and a two-match sanction. He has no existing good or bad record for this offence. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to 168.75 points and a one-match sanction. 

Other incidents Assessed:

Contact between Hawthorn’s Josh Gibson and Collingwood’s Andrew Krakouer from the fourth quarter of Friday’s match was assessed. It was the view of the panel the force used was below that required to constitute a reportable offence. No further action was taken.

Contact between the Sydney Swans’ Jude Bolton and the Adelaide Crows’ Patrick Dangerfield from the fourth quarter of Saturday’s match was assessed. Dangerfield has the ball and was preparing to kick and Bolton comes towards him. Bolton has both his arms outstretched initially in a bid to smother his opponent’s kick and then braces for contact as Dangerfield disposes of the ball. It was the view of the panel that Bolton’s action to brace for contact was not a striking motion. No further action was taken.

Contact between West Coast’s Sam Butler and North Melbourne’s Lachlan Hansen from the second quarter of Sunday’s match was assessed. It was the view of the panel the force used was below that required to constitute a reportable offence. No further action was taken.

Following players were reported from the weekend’s matches:

Nick Maxwell, Collingwood, reported by umpire Shane McInerney for engaging in rough conduct against Paul Puopolo, Hawthorn, during the third quarter of the First Qualifying Final between Collingwood and Hawthorn, played at the MCG on Friday September 7, 2012.

James Kelly, Geelong Cats, reported by umpire Troy Pannell for engaging in rough conduct against Tendai Mzungu, Fremantle, during the second quarter of the Second Elimination Final between the Geelong Cats and Fremantle, played at the MCG on Saturday September 8, 2012.

Speak Your Mind

*

  • keratin
  • spray directions
  • can you take z pack
  • keramag plan 1 waschtischunterschrank
  • patent expiration date
  • effect does have blood pressure
  • side effects of stopping cold turkey
  • can take tylenol 3
  • what does antibiotic treat
  • does cause low libido
  • efficacy international trial
  • interaction
  • can you mix benadryl and d
  • biodiesel telefono
  • after surgery
  • gold 800 mg
  • cerotti composizione
  • bula remedio 90mg
  • k bestellen
  • fda warning users
  • ds safe take
  • 5 mg cut in half
  • scalp psoriasis shampoo
  • solutab syringe
  • monthly cost daily use
  • time to take effect
  • does help with hair loss
  • mups plm
  • schmiegel 150 g
  • xr 300 mg tablet
  • syrup
  • how much should i take after cycle
  • 1200 mg
  • generic substitute
  • for gad
  • or
  • and side effects
  • 100mg
  • 5 mg bipolar
  • comparison of and
  • can you use pregnant
  • d classification
  • can cause gas
  • d coupon
  • fungsi inhaler
  • pfizer generic
  • taking and alcohol
  • efectos embarazo
  • for chronic cough
  • 2473270824
  • and drug interaction
  • inhaler shelf life
  • 2 mg \/ml
  • package insert mccook
  • does affect gains
  • how fast does er work
  • cervical dystonia
  • v.
  • can give false positive pregnancy test
  • dose elderly
  • and acid reflux
  • can expire
  • xr vs
  • famine maleate
  • tablets cost
  • que contiene el medicamento
  • vs xr for insomnia
  • for blood pressure
  • hydrochloride 1 cream
  • reditabs directions use
  • changing from zoloft to
  • taking fruit juice
  • reviews about
  • k
  • blood pressure meds
  • cara makan ubat
  • 25 mg tablets
  • patient assistance
  • wellbutrin combination
  • taking 45 years old
  • dosage in children
  • in early pregnancy
  • gastro resistant
  • reactions
  • achilles tendon lawsuit
  • buy at walmart
  • package insert fda
  • back pain side effects
  • tinnitus
  • taken together
  • cramping sign ovulation
  • gp prescription
  • rare side effects
  • photosensitivity
  • adderall xr together
  • goes off patent
  • for oral herpes dosage
  • and prozac together
  • interaction with
  • using when you don't need it
  • compare generic
  • klonopin combination
  • tabletki na robaki
  • piggyback infant tylenol
  • que es mejor o
  • gotas 20mg bula
  • smoking weed after
  • after superdrol
  • average dose
  • y mujeres
  • contre indications
  • does make you hungry
  • when do i start birth control
  • o treda
  • first approved fda
  • dose children
  • foggy brain
  • jelly bijwerkingen
  • long term effects
  • vs zoloft side effects
  • 5 mg tablet
  • recreational use
  • what does it do
  • treat bronchitis
  • can help with social anxiety
  • mail order canada
  • safe dosage
  • for pain relief
  • for dementia patients
  • check rebate status
  • lichen sclerosus
  • peak effect
  • diferencia entre y retard
  • tab
  • remove sebum
  • can cause hair loss
  • is a chemo drug
  • month 4
  • lyotabs effets secondaires
  • dosage for oily skin
  • withdrawal duration symptoms
  • can you overdose
  • vs other snris
  • does cause stomach pain
  • men energy
  • available forms
  • why take after ivf
  • pins needles
  • pi
  • weight loss
  • buy canada
  • safety first trimester
  • there generic substitute
  • pfizer instructions
  • stopping diarrhea
  • level frequency
  • causing seizures
  • tablets 0.5mg
  • side effects wear off
  • qual o melhor ou
  • dosage bartonella
  • prescription
  • depression reviews
  • liquid side effects
  • gel liver failure
  • together
  • rdy 340
  • stroke .ppt
  • online no prescription
  • medicine called
  • long take effect
  • switching zoloft
  • side effects weight gain
  • low dose aspirin
  • pediatrics
  • keramag nr. 1 50x38
  • sinusitis dosage
  • not working
  • patient assistance program
  • interaction
  • will show up urine drug test
  • en crema embarazo
  • positive comments
  • much does generic cost
  • how long on before ivf
  • original indication
  • spray packungsbeilage
  • purpose
  • se ven resultados
  • used for migraines
  • does or work better
  • canada legitimate msnbc
  • taking pct
  • o triatop
  • cost australia
  • and generic
  • for treatment of raynaud's syndrome
  • taking for 7 days
  • injection cluster headaches
  • for blood pressure patients
  • taking during breastfeeding
  • baby ovulation calculator check out
  • can you take adipex together
  • 4 mg generic
  • can i get a prescription for online
  • effetto cefoperazone
  • o que A
  • webmd
  • espanol
  • medication class
  • good ibs
  • simplicity
  • flas efectos adversos
  • does make your period shorter
  • antifungal cream reviews
  • uk
  • hyperactivity
  • food poisoning
  • side effects achilles tendon
  • recall mcneil
  • check pregnancy test after taking
  • free samples
  • time
  • contraindications
  • increasing dosage
  • uk suppliers
  • and breastfeeding side effects
  • and muscle aches side effects
  • buy generic
  • dosing conversion
  • causes sweating
  • can you take codeine cough syrup
  • klonopin interaction
  • generic
  • high blood pressure
  • female available india
  • can you take advil while on
  • for sale in canada
  • total hip replacement
  • joint pain temporary
  • xr side reviews
  • does cause increased heart rate
  • upset stomach
  • side effects nausea
  • how soon does work
  • and birth control pills
  • sore throat
  • norepinephrine dopamine
  • triplo 320
  • dangerous
  • ausschreibungstext nr 1 plan
  • generic alternative
  • increasing during pregnancy
  • knee pain
  • difference entre
  • together
  • side effects impotence
  • and vitamin k deficiency
  • drug classification
  • can you take
  • reviews weight loss
  • effects menstrual cycle
  • bloating gas
  • atherosclerosis study
  • xr vs
  • dopamine agonist
  • can you take atrial fibrillation
  • 1 mes embarazo
  • dose
  • drug interaction between tramadol
  • y sibutramina reductil
  • picture cr tablet
  • what do do for women
  • 7 solution
  • pediatric dosing
  • different milligrams
  • natural alternative taking
  • epstein barr syndrome
  • buy dhaka
  • o que e
  • xarope pediatrico
  • 1 yr old
  • how works
  • i cant sleep
  • action
  • menopause
  • versus
  • sulfa drug
  • e
  • 30 mg enough
  • and combination side effects
  • ativan im
  • elevated liver enzymes
  • entire pregnancy
  • and toprol xl
  • long term effects taking
  • medication contraindications
  • ja existe o generico
  • adverse effects
  • versus
  • kompas
  • and liver cancer
  • max dosage
  • 1000 mg yan etkileri
  • no period
  • plus 16\/12 5 mg tabletten
  • and prostate cancer risk
  • dosage info
  • safe kittens
  • in breast milk
  • dose horses
  • retarde t il les rA?gles
  • roche patient assistance program
  • can take tums while taking
  • candida medication
  • kat bijsluiter
  • can you take and d together
  • retail price 40mg
  • pain med
  • buy cream
  • e impotencia
  • is safe during pregnancy
  • latest news regarding
  • early signs of pregnancy using
  • 5056583590
  • online no prescription
  • novartis
  • chance of multiples on 100mg
  • a statin
  • drinking alcohol while taking
  • actors in tv commercials
  • 150 before after food
  • dosing in children
  • iv h pylori
  • no longer working
  • canada
  • applying cream infant
  • for women pre contest
  • is penicillin based
  • comprar brasil
  • and artificial insemination success stories
  • sleep dosage
  • used prophylaxis
  • versus anxiety
  • using l-arginine and
  • pastillas para que sirve
  • can you use cream face
  • risks benefits
  • 0.25mg
  • 10mg la thuoc gi
  • migraine
  • does contain le
  • topical
  • does cause dizziness
  • can take
  • 100mg instructions
  • once contraindications
  • kim richards
  • would you expect same drug class
  • antidepressant reviews
  • 4796756093
  • nedir
  • and
  • injection im
  • trichomoniasis treatment dose
  • coming off after one month
  • d fever
  • 100 micrograms \/dose inhaler
  • combo side effects
  • 1880599007
  • pills
  • fast do you lose weight
  • over 70
  • shelf life of generic
  • efectos secundarios a largo plazo de
  • abuse
  • make you gain weight
  • buy online uk
  • how does work in the body
  • flovent inhaler vs
  • safe in pregnancy
  • high blood pressure medication
  • en espaAol
  • pom to p switch
  • roerig 200
  • does reduce swelling
  • vs prozac vs
  • v.
  • is a good antidepressant
  • help with dry skin
  • odd
  • pistorasia
  • xr therapeutic dose
  • dosage of for infants in ml
  • used for anxiety
  • is good for ocd
  • 25 mg
  • chronic urticaria
  • plus retard efectos secundarios
  • what time of day is best to take